Patterson v. Schriro, et al
| 2:2005cv01159 |
| April 15, 2005 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Paul G Rosenblatt |
| Virginia A Mathis |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
ORDER, that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 145). Defendants' 145 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part as follows: (a) the motion is gran ted as to summary judgment in favor of Defendants on the remaining First Amendment claim; (b) the motion is denied as to attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and terminate the action. For the reasons set forth herein, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from the judgment in this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 5/30/12.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
154
ORDER denying without prejudice the 144 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 4/17/12.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER denying 136 Motion to Continue or Reinstate Stay. The previously ordered time frame in which the parties have to file any dispositive motions is sua sponte extended. Such motions, by any party, shall be filed no later than March 13, 2012. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 2/27/12.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER re 136 MOTION to continue or reinstate Stay : The expiration on January 30, 2012, by its own terms, of this court's 30 day stay renders moot plaintiff's motion to the extent he is seeking a continuance of such stay. There is s till the outstanding issue, however, of whether the court should, as plaintiff seeks, reinstate that stay. In any event, because the original 30 day stay has been lifted, to that extent plaintiff's pending motion seeks to reinstate that stay, such motion is properly before this court. Before ruling on that motion, however, the court will await defendants' response, if any. In the interim, any dispositive motions which the parties desire to file shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 2/2/12. (DMT)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER re 131 Motion for Delay/Stay: The Court grants plaintiff a stay, but only, as defendants agree, for 30 days from the date of entry of this order and grants plaintiff the right to file a motion, prior to the expirationo of the initial 30- day stay, for an additional stay not to exceed 30 days upon a showing that his physical and emotional condition has not improved sufficiently for him to participate meaningfully in these proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 12/29/11.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER re 128 Motion for Clarification and if Needed Noticeof Appeal: GRANTING to the extent he is seeking clarification, but DENIED as moot insofar as he is seeking leave to file a Notice of Appeal. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 10/25/11.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER withdrawing the reference to the Magistrate Judge as to (Doc. 115). Granting 115 Defendants' Amended Motion to Dismiss RLUIPA and Injunction Claims with prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/26/11.(DMT) *Modified on 8/26/2011 to add text* (DMT).
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER denying 121 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike ; denying 122 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 12/1/10.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 90) and Plaintiff's Motion for Deferment (Doc. 95). Denying as moot 90 Motion to Dismiss Counts/Claims; denying as moot 95 Motion for Deferment. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 10/13/10.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Order and denying 87 Motion for injunctive relief. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/31/10.(DMT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patterson v. Schriro, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
