Ortiz v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
2:2005cv02837 |
September 16, 2005 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Mark E Aspey |
Earl H Carroll |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 205 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that a Jury Trial is set for 10/19/2010 at 9:00 AM. FURTHER ORDERED that the attys for each party shall participate in a Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/28/2010 at 1:30 PM. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties file a Joint Statu s Report by 9/22/2010. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file their revised proposed jury instructions, revised proposed voir dire questions, revised proposed juror questionnaires, and revised proposed forms of verdict no later than thirty (30) days before trial. FURTHER ORDERED that any motions in limine shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days before trial. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall keep the Court apprised of the possibility of settlement. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 8/27/10. (SAT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ortiz v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.