Crago v. Schriro et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 29, 2010
ORDER re 141 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, adjudged, and decreed, approving of said stipulation and the above entitled and numbered cause of action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, the parties to bear their own attorneys fees and costs. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 9/29/10. (KMG)
|January 30, 2009
ORDER; the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' 120 Motion for Reconsideration; all other matters in this action remain with the Magistrate Judge for disposition as appropriate; granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 120 Motion for Reconsideration; the motion is granted as to Defendants Johnson, Andre, Trujillo, and Schriro, they are entitled to summary judgment and are dismissed from this action with prejudice; the motion is otherwise denied; the remaining claim is Count I against Teed. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 1/29/09.(REW, )
|September 25, 2008
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Dfts' 97 Motion for Summary Judgment. All other matters in this action remain with the Magistrate Judge for disposition as appropriate. Dfts' 97 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to Counts II and III. The motion is otherwise denied. Pla's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. The remaining claim is Count I against Teed, Johnson, Andre, Trujillo and Schriro. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 9/24/08. (SAT)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?