Gago de Medeiros v. Gonzales
2:2006cv00816 |
March 20, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
David K Duncan (PS) |
James A Teilborg |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 112 ORDER denying Petitioner's 111 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 3/19/10.(REW) |
Filing 107 ORDER accepting Report and Recommendations 93 and denying as moot 106 Motion for Extension of Time. The petition 32 in this case is denied and dismissed as moot and the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 1/7/10.(LAD, ) |
Filing 93 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION : Recommending that Julian Gago de Medeiros' Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed as moot 32 .Recommending that de Medeiros' Motion for TemporaryRestraining Order/Preliminary Injunction/Summary Judgment be denied 56 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Julian Gago de Medeiros' Motions to Compel, Produce and/or Supplement, and for E tensions are denied as moot (Doc. numbers 55 , 61 , 64 , 65 , 67 , 70 , 75 , 82 , 83 , 89 , 90 . Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 8/18/09. (DMT, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gago de Medeiros v. Gonzales | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.