Hess v. Schriro et al

Case Number: 2:2006cv01639
Filed: June 28, 2006
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Referring Judge: Jay R Irwin
Presiding Judge: Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 25, 2009 79 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Reply to Respondents' Response to Petitioner's Objection to Report and Recommendation (doc. #78) is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 71 is accepted and adopted by the Court. FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied and that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 8/24/09.(KMG, )
May 12, 2009 71 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus : Recommending that that Grounds 3, 4, 11 and 12 of Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jay R Irwin on 05/12/09. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hess v. Schriro et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?