Sanders v. City of Phoenix et al

Case Number: 2:2006cv01644
Filed: June 29, 2006
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 30, 2010 130 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the City of Phoenix's Motion 96 for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court TERMINATE this action. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/30/10.(KMG)
December 8, 2009 81 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 76 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Defendants' Motion to Strike Paragraph 25 of the FAC (Dkt. # 76 at 4) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 77 Plaintiff's request for leave to amend is DENIED. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/8/09.(LSP)
November 24, 2008 49 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Dfts' 36 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Pla's race-based hostile work environment claim and § 1981 claim; that Dfts' 36 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to Pla's gender-based claims, disparate treatment claims, retaliation claims and § 1983 claims. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/24/08. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanders v. City of Phoenix et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?