Herbal Care Systems, Inc. et al v. Plaza et al

Case Number: 2:2006cv02698
Filed: November 9, 2006
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge: Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 23, 2009 117 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS ORDERED Defendant Plaza's 101 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 7/23/09.(SAT)
March 17, 2009 98 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion for Summary Judgment FURTHER ORDERED denying 89 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs Count 2 (Breach of Contract) is DISMISSED with prejudice as to James and Joyce Pla za. FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs Wilhardt, Coghlin, Grundemann, and Oak Leaf Trusts Count 3 (Breach of Fiduciary Duty) is DISMISSED with prejudice as to James and Joyce Plaza. FURTHER ORDERED Joint Proposed Pretrial Order is due 5/15/09. FURTHER ORDERE D final pretrial conference is set for 8/7/09 at 1:30 P.M. FURTHER ORDERED a status conference is set to review Juror Questionnaires on 8/10/09 at 1:30 P.M. FURTHER ORDERED Trial is set for 8/11/09 at 8:30 A.M. See Order for Full Details. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/17/09.(MAP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Herbal Care Systems, Inc. et al v. Plaza et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?