O'Connell v. Smith et al
| Dorothy O'Connell |
| Maricopa County Supervisors, Board of, Mary Rose Wilcox, Max W Wilson, David R Smith, Sandi Wilson, Christopher Bradley, Gwynn Simpson, Bill Scalzo, Karen Stewart, Mary C Cronin, Linda Gray, Betty Adams, Don Stapley, Fulton Brock, Andrew Kunasek, Maricopa County, John Does and Jane Does |
| 2:2007cv00198 |
| January 26, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Stephen M McNamee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER pursuant to 106 Stipulation of Dismissal: this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/27/09. (LSP)
|
|
Filing
94
RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 3/19/2010. Dispositive motions due by 4/30/2010. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/14/2010 03:00 PM before Judge Stephen M McNamee. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 7/28/2009. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER that Defendants shall have until 11/7/08 to re-file their 13 MOTION to Dismiss. The motion will be considered fully briefed on the date the Motion to Dismiss is filed. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/14/08. (LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
