McCool v. Schriro et al
| Eddie Bernard McCool |
| Dora B. Schriro and Terry Goddard |
| 2:2007cv00300 |
| February 9, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Charles R Pyle (PS) |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The 16 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the order of this Court; the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed because his claims are procedurally defaulted; the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 10/6/09. (REW, )
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court enter an order DISMISSING the Petition of Writ of Habeas Corpus. Pursuant to 28:636 any party may serve and file written objections within 10 days of being served with a c opy of the Report and Recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. The parties are advised that any objections filed re to be identified with the following case number: cv-07-300-SRB. The Clk is directed to mail a copy of the Report and Recommendation to Petitioner and counsel for Respondents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles R Pyle on 9/21/09. (SGG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
