Dial Up Services, Inc. v. Oregon, State of et al.
Plaintiff: Dial Up Services Incorporated
Defendant: Missouri, State of, Idaho, State of, North Dakota, State of, Unknown Parties, David E Reich, Oregon, State of and Kathryn Sticklen
Case Number: 2:2007cv00423
Filed: February 22, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Earl H Carroll
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2009 Filing 66 MANDATE of 9th Circuit (Certified Copy), as to #62 Notice of Appeal, Appeal case number 07-17312, filed by Dial Up Services, Inc. Appellant's motion to voluntarily dismiss this case is GRANTED. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. (Attachments: #1 NDA)(ESL)
December 27, 2007 Filing 65 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Case Number 07-17312 for #62 Notice of Appeal. (KMG)
December 13, 2007 Filing 64 Notice of Appeal Notification Form; Notice of Appeal and copy of docket sheet transmitted to Ninth Circuit and all parties re #62 Notice of Appeal, (KMG)
December 11, 2007 CADS Sent re #62 Notice of Appeal : Civil Appeals Docketing Statement sent to 9th Circuit on this date. (KMG)
December 10, 2007 Filing 63 Notice re OF APPEAL TO THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS by Dial Up Services, Inc. re #62 Notice of Appeal, (Strojnik, Peter)
December 10, 2007 Filing 62 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit, as to #59 Clerk's Judgment, #61 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct, #58 Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case/Lack of Jurisdiction, Order on Motion for Sanctions, Order on Motion for TRO, by Dial Up Services, Inc.. Filing fee received: $ 455.00, receipt number 09700000000001600231. (Strojnik, Peter) Modified on 12/10/2007 DOCUMENT FILED WITHOUT PDF. ATTORNEY CORRECTED AT DOC. #63 (KMG).
December 4, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER denying Pla's #60 Motion to Amend or Make Additional Factual Fundings [sic] Under Rule 52(b); To Alter or Amend the Judgment Under Rule 59(e); For a New Trial Under Rule 59(a); and For Relief Under Rule 60. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 12/3/07.(KMG)
December 3, 2007 Filing 60 AMENDED MOTION to Amend/Correct re Judgment UNDER RULE 59e FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 59a AND FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60 by Dial Up Services, Inc.. (Strojnik, Peter)
November 27, 2007 Filing 59 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Idaho, State of, North Dakota, State of, Oregon, State of, THE HONORABLE DAVID E. REICH, JUDGE OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, The State of Missouri, Various States, Kathryn Sticklen against Dial Up Services, Inc. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by way of this Court dismissing this action for lack of personal jurisdiction over Defendants. Plaintiff shall take nothing. Signed on 11/27/07. (KMG, )
November 27, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER granting Dfts' various motions to dismiss Dkts. #25 , #34 , #35 , #37 , #38 for lack of personal jurisdiction over Dfts. The Complaint is dismissed as to all Dfts. FURTHER ORDERED denying Pla's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order #6 . Denying Dfts' various motions for sanctions Dkts. #47 , #49 , #51 . Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 11/26/07.(KMG)
June 7, 2007 Filing 57 REPLY in Support re #51 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff's Counsel and in Opposition to Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1927 filed by Idaho, State of, Kathryn Sticklen. (DeLange, Brett)
June 7, 2007 Filing 56 REPLY to Response to Motion re #47 MOTION for Sanctions against Dial Up Services filed by THE HONORABLE DAVID E. REICH, JUDGE OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. (Bahr, Douglas)
June 5, 2007 Filing 55 REPLY in Support re #49 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions, filed by North Dakota, State of. (Thomas, James)
May 29, 2007 Filing 54 AFFIDAVIT of THOMAS L. KUMMER re #52 Response to Motion, by Plaintiff Dial Up Services, Inc.. (Strojnik, Peter)
May 29, 2007 Filing 53 AFFIDAVIT of PETER STROJNIK re #52 Response to Motion, by Plaintiff Dial Up Services, Inc.. (Strojnik, Peter)
May 29, 2007 Filing 52 RESPONSE to Motion re #51 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff's Counsel, #49 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel, #47 MOTION for Sanctions against Dial Up Services PLAINTIFF'S AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S RESPONSE TO VARIOUS MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS AND MOTION FOR 28 U.S.C. 1927 AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES filed by Dial Up Services, Inc.. (Strojnik, Peter)
May 21, 2007 Filing 51 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff's Counsel by Idaho, State of, Kathryn Sticklen. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support#2 Affidavit Brett DeLange, Third, In Support#3 Exhibit A to Third Affidavit of Brett DeLange#4 Exhibit B to Third Affidavit of Brett DeLange#5 Exhibit C to Third Affidavit of Brett DeLange#6 Exhibit D to Third Affidavit of Brett DeLange)(DeLange, Brett)
May 18, 2007 Filing 50 BRIEF In Support of Rule 11 Sanctions by Defendant North Dakota, State of. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1)(Thomas, James)
May 18, 2007 Filing 49 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel by North Dakota, State of. (Thomas, James)
May 17, 2007 Filing 48 MEMORANDUM re: Support of re #47 MOTION for Sanctions against Dial Up Services by Defendant THE HONORABLE DAVID E. REICH, JUDGE OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Register of Actions#2 Exhibit Motion to Compel#3 Exhibit Affidavit of Service#4 Exhibit Order Granting Motion to Compel#5 Exhibit Affidavit of Service#6 Exhibit Notice Pursuant to Rule 11)(Bahr, Douglas)
May 17, 2007 Filing 47 MOTION for Sanctions against Dial Up Services by THE HONORABLE DAVID E. REICH, JUDGE OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. (Bahr, Douglas)
May 1, 2007 Filing 46 Notice re NOTICE OF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION'S ASSERTION OF CONTINUING JURISDICTION IN AID OF PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND RESPONSE TO VARIOUS MOTIONS TO DISMISS by Dial Up Services, Inc. re #38 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), #37 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), #6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, #34 MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction, #41 Response to Motion,, #35 MOTION to Dismiss Case (Strojnik, Peter)
April 26, 2007 Filing 45 REPLY in Support re #38 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) filed by The State of Missouri. (Schneider, Anne)
April 26, 2007 Filing 44 REPLY in Support re #37 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) filed by North Dakota, State of. (Thomas, James)
April 26, 2007 Filing 43 REPLY in Support re #25 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Oregon, State of. (Fletcher, Charles)
April 26, 2007 Filing 42 REPLY in Support re #34 MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Idaho, State of, Kathryn Sticklen. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Second of Brett DeLange in Support of State of Idaho's and Hon. Kathryn Sticklen's Motion to Dismiss#2 Exhibit A to Second Affidavit of Brett DeLange)(DeLange, Brett)
April 26, 2007 Filing 41 RESPONSE to Motion re #38 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), #37 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), #34 MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction, #25 MOTION to Dismiss Case, #35 MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by Dial Up Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1#2 Exhibit Exhibit 2#3 Exhibit Exhibit 3#4 Errata Exhibit 4)(Strojnik, Peter)
April 25, 2007 Filing 40 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re #39 Response in Opposition to Motion,, filed by Dial Up Services, Inc.. Description of deficiency: Document does not contain a signature and is illegible. (TLJ)
April 19, 2007 Filing 39 RESPONSE in Opposition re #38 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), #37 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), #34 MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction, #25 MOTION to Dismiss Case, #35 MOTION to Dismiss Case TO MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Dial Up Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1#2 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2#3 Exhibit EXHIBIT 3#4 Exhibit EXHIBIT 4)(Strojnik, Peter) Modified on 4/25/2007 (TLJ). DOCUMENT IS ILLEGIBLE (EXHIBIT 3, PAGE 4) AND DOES NOT CONTAIN A SIGNATURE. ATTORNEY NOTICED TO REFILE.
April 15, 2007 Filing 38 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) by The State of Missouri. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Schneider, Anne)
April 13, 2007 Filing 37 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) by North Dakota, State of. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of State of ND's Motion to Dismiss)(Thomas, James)
April 13, 2007 Filing 36 MEMORANDUM re: Support of re #35 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendants THE HONORABLE DAVID E. REICH, JUDGE OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, THE HONORABLE DAVID E. REICH, JUDGE OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Register of Actions#2 Exhibit Motion to Compel#3 Exhibit Affidavit of Service#4 Exhibit Order Granting Motion to Compel#5 Exhibit Affidavit of Service)(Bahr, Douglas)
April 13, 2007 Filing 35 MOTION to Dismiss Case by THE HONORABLE DAVID E. REICH, JUDGE OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. (Bahr, Douglas)
April 11, 2007 Filing 34 MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction by Idaho, State of, Kathryn Sticklen. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss#2 Affidavit of Barbara Beehner-Kane in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(DeLange, Brett)
April 9, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting #32 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS BY THE STATE OF OREGON. Pla shall have up to including 4/20/07 to file a response to Dft State of Oregon's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 4/6/07. (LSP)
April 5, 2007 Filing 32 STIPULATION re #25 MOTION to Dismiss Case TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS BY THE STATE OF OREGON by Dial Up Services, Inc.. (Strojnik, Peter)
March 27, 2007 Filing 31 TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing Proceedings held on 3/23/07 before Judge Earl H Carroll. Court Reporter: Candy L Potter. (BAS, )
March 27, 2007 Filing 30 TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDER FORM by nonparty James Prunty of the Federal Trade Commission for oral argument proceedings held on 3/23/07 before Judge Earl H Carroll. (BAS, )
March 23, 2007 Filing 29 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Earl H Carroll. Motion hearing held on 3/23/2007 re: #6 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Dial Up Services, Inc. ORDER taking the motion under advisement. (Court Reporter Candy Potter.)(TLB )
March 22, 2007 Filing 28 MEMORANDUM re #6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES by Plaintiff Dial Up Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1#2 Exhibit Exhibit 2#3 Exhibit Exhibit 3#4 Exhibit Exhibit 4)(Strojnik, Peter)
March 22, 2007 Filing 27 DECLARATION of Thomas K. Elden in Support of State of Oregon's Motion to Dismiss and Opposing Plaintiff's Application for Temporary Restraining Order re #25 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Oregon, State of. (Fletcher, Charles)
March 22, 2007 Filing 26 MEMORANDUM re: Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Opposing Plaintiff's Application for Temporary Restraining Order re #25 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Oregon, State of. (Fletcher, Charles)
March 22, 2007 Filing 25 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Oregon, State of. (Fletcher, Charles)
March 21, 2007 Filing 24 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by North Dakota, State of. (Thomas, James)
March 21, 2007 Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order State of Idaho's and the Honorable Kathryn Sticklen's Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Veridifed Application for A Temporary Restraining Order [Doc No 6] filed by Idaho, State of, Kathryn Sticklen. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Brett T. DeLange in Support of Brief in Opposition#2 Exhibit A to Affidavit#3 Exhibit A.2 to Affidavit#4 Exhibit A.3 to Affidavit#5 Exhibit B to Affidavit#6 Exhibit C to Affidavit#7 Exhibit D to Affidavit)(DeLange, Brett)
March 21, 2007 Filing 22 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by THE HONORABLE DAVID E. REICH, JUDGE OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Register of Actions#2 Exhibit Motion to Compel#3 Exhibit Affidavit of Service (Motion to Compel)#4 Exhibit Order Granting Motion to Compel#5 Exhibit Affidavit of Service (Order))(Bahr, Douglas)
March 20, 2007 Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by The State of Missouri. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Response to Civil Investigative Demand))(Schneider, Anne)
March 16, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER pursuant to General Order 05-25 granting #19 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice.Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS, )(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
March 16, 2007 Filing 19 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Charles E Fletcher on behalf of Oregon, State of. (BAS, )
March 16, 2007 PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 100, receipt number PHX955690 as to Charles E Fletcher. (BAS, )
March 15, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER pursuant to General Order 05-25 granting #17 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice.Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS, )(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
March 15, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER pursuant to General Order 05-25 granting #15 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice.Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS, )(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
March 15, 2007 Filing 15 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Douglas A Bhar on behalf of THE HONORABLE DAVID E. REICH, JUDGE OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. (BAS, )
March 15, 2007 PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 100, receipt number PHX055605 as to Douglas A Bahr. (BAS, )
March 15, 2007 PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 100, receipt number PHX055590 as to James Patrick Thomas. (BAS, )
March 14, 2007 Filing 17 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney James Patrick Thomas on behalf of North Dakota, State of. (BAS, )
March 14, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER pursuant to General Order 05-25 granting #13 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice.Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS, )(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
March 14, 2007 Filing 13 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Anne E Schneider on behalf of defendant The State of Missouri. (BAS, )
March 14, 2007 PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 100, receipt number PHX055565 as to Anne E Schneider. (BAS, )
March 13, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER pursuant to General Order 05-25 granting #11 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice.Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS, )(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
March 13, 2007 PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 100, receipt number PHX055449 as to Brett DeLange. (BAS, )
March 12, 2007 Filing 11 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Brett DeLange on behalf of defendant Idaho, State of. (BAS, )
March 12, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER setting a Hearing as to Pla's Application/ #6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order : Motion Hearing set for 3/23/2007 at 03:00PM before Judge Earl H Carroll. FURTHER ORDERED that Pla shall provide notice to dfts' counsel. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 3/9/07. (KMG)
March 9, 2007 Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re #6 Application filed by Dial Up Services, Inc. Description of deficiency: Incorrect document type selected. Do Not Refile. (KMG)
March 9, 2007 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to The State of Missouri, Honorable David E.Reich, Honorable Kathryn Sticklen. (Attachments: #1 Reich#2 Sticklen)(Entered by PEM)
March 6, 2007 Filing 7 DECLARATION re #6 Application OF DEVAL JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF VERIFIED APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Plaintiff Dial Up Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1#2 Exhibit Exhibit 2#3 Exhibit Exhibit 3#4 Exhibit Exhibit 4)(Strojnik, Peter)
March 6, 2007 Filing 6 MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Plaintiff Dial Up Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1#2 Exhibit Exhibit 2#3 Exhibit Exhibit 3#4 Exhibit Exhibit 4)(Strojnik, Peter) Modified on 3/9/2007 INCORRECT EVENT SELECTED. THIS ENTRY HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM (Application Verified Application for a Temporary Restraing Order) TO (Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order) (KMG).
March 6, 2007 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Dial Up Services, Inc..(Strojnik, Peter)
February 26, 2007 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Oregon, State of, Idaho, State of, North Dakota, State of. (Attachments: #1 Idaho#2 North Dakota)(entered by PEM)
February 22, 2007 Filing 3 Filing fee paid 2/23/07, receipt number PHX054506. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Earl H Carroll. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV07-423-PHX-EHC. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (PEM)
February 22, 2007 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Dial Up Services, Inc,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A#2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Strojnik, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dial Up Services, Inc. v. Oregon, State of et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Missouri, State of
Represented By: Anne E Schneider,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Idaho, State of
Represented By: Brett T DeLange,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Dakota, State of
Represented By: James Patrick Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David E Reich
Represented By: Douglas Alan Bahr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oregon, State of
Represented By: Charles Edward Fletcher,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathryn Sticklen
Represented By: Brett T DeLange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dial Up Services Incorporated
Represented By: Peter Strojnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?