Hans v. Homesite Indemnity Company, et al
| Olivia O. Hans |
| Homesite Indemnity Company, Jane Does, John Does, Black and White Partnership and ABC Corporations |
| Homesite Indemnity Company |
| Olivia O. Hans |
| 2:2008cv00393 |
| February 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Insurance Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
ORDER that third-party Robert Hanna's Motion 108 for Ruling on the Signatures of the Damron Agreement is denied; that Robert Hanna's Motion (Doc. #108) to Have the Oral Deposition of Robert D. Hanna Taken is denied; that Robert Hanna' ;s Motion (Doc. #108) to Have Protected Mental Health Records Destroyed is denied; that Robert Hanna's Motion to Provide Further Documents is denied (Doc. #108); that Robert Hanna's Motion to Intervene is denied Doc. # 117 , 118 ; that Ro bert Hanna's Motion of Disclosure to Discover is denied (Doc. # 117, 118); that Robert Hanna's Motion to Plead Special Matters is denied (Doc. # 117, 118); that Robert Hanna's Motion to Discuss Cross-Claim Against Olivia Hans is denied 132 ; and that Robert Hanna's Motion to Discuss Third-Party Claim Against Brian Warnock is denied (Doc. # 132). FURTHER ORDERED that Dft Homesite Indemnity Company's Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Pla Pro Se Robert D. Hanna's counter- Claim 111 is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Robert Hanna' third-party claims against Olivia O. Hans and Brian Warnock are dismissed with prejudice for the reasons contained in this Order (Doc. # 115, 117, 118). FURTHER ORDERED that Olivia O. Ha ns and Homesite Indemnity Company's Stipulation of Dismissal is granted 119 . FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal between Olivia O. Hans and Homesite Indemnity Company based upon their stipulation (Doc. # 119), and judgment in favor of Olivia O. Hans, Homesite Indemnity Company, and Brian Warnock against Hanna on all of his counterclaims and third-party claims. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/16/09.(KMG, )
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER that Mr. Hanna's 92 Motion to "attach", which is in reality a motion to consolidate CV08-2331-PHX-DKD with this case is denied; denying Mr. Hanna's 93 Motion to "drop the lawsuit against Judge James A. Teilborg" ;; the 60 Motion for clarification is granted to the extent that the Court notes for the record that the Court will not treat document # 56 as a motion; denying 66 Motion to destroy illegally obtained records; denying 70 Motion for Extension o f Time and Motion to destroy protected mental health records; denying without prejudice 73 Motion, 79 Motion, and 91 Motion as duplicative; Mr. Hanna's 93 Motion to Withdraw his counterclaim against Homesite Indemnity Company is granted as follows: 77 is deemed withrdawn (and stricken from the record), 56 Answer is also withdrawn and stricken from the record. 87 Motion to Dismiss Counter Claim is denied as moot; Mr. Hanna's 94 Motion to attach a third-party claim to Olivia Hans is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 01/15/09. (NOTE: SEE ATTACHED PDF FOR FULL DETAILS. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting Dft Homesite Indemnity Company's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer 39 . The Clerk shall file the Amended Answer lodged at Doc. 40 . Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 10/29/08.(KMG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
