Rico-Bustamante v United States of America
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rico-Bustamante
Defendant:
United States of America
Case Number:
2:2008cv01108
Filed:
June 12, 2008
Court:
Arizona District Court
Office:
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office
County:
Maricopa
Referring Judge:
David K Duncan (PS)
Presiding Judge:
Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit:
None
Cause of Action:
U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:
28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
December 29, 2010 | 7 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rico-Bustamante v United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Lynne Tyler Ingram |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gabriel Rico-Bustamante | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.