Johnson, et al v. First American Title Insurance Company
| John C Johnson, Daniel Perez and Elizabeth Perez |
| First American Title Insurance Company |
| 2:2008cv01184 |
| June 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| P.I.: Other Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
359
ORDER granting 353 Motion for Attorney Fees. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement between the parties, attorneys' fees and costs in the total amount of $300,000 are awarded in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/14/2012.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
336
ORDER denying 303 Defendant's Motion to Strike ; Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 317 is granted on the issue of liability on the unjust enrichment claim, and denied on the question of damages; denying 321 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court will set a final pretrial conference by separate order (see attached pdf for complete information). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/1/11.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
300
ORDER denying 259 Motion to decertify; denying 268 Motion for Discovery; granting 284 Motion to Seal Document. The Clerk has sealed the Declaration of Bruce McFarlane (Doc. 269) and the Declaration of Reed Simpson (Docs. 270, 271). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/1/11.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
257
ORDER Defendant's motion for decertification 235 is granted. Pursuant to Rules 23(c)(1)(C) and (2)(B), the class is decertified with respect to class members who purchased policies from agents of Defendant and who cannot be provided individua l notice. The parties shall, by December 1, 2010, file a joint revised class definition. Plaintiffs shall mail notice to members of the class by December 10, 2010. Class members shall have until January 25, 2011 to respond to the notice and opt ou t of the class. Plaintiffs shall notify Defendant of the class members who have opted out of the class by February 7, 2011. The deadline for filing dispositive motions is February 21, 2011. All other terms of the Court's Second Case Management Order (Doc. 108) remain in effect.Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/22/10. (DMT)
|
|
Filing
237
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 217 and 218 Plaintiffs' Motion to compel, see PDF document for details; denying without prejudice 235 Defendant's Motion for decertification. A conference call to address modifications to the second case management order (Doc. 108) is set for October 5, 2010, at 3:00 p.m. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/27/10.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
222
ORDER re 198 ORDER re temporal scope of class 102 . Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/8/2010. Unfair discrimination claim decertified. Class definition for unjust enrichment claim is revised as set forth in this order. (NVO)
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER re temporal scope of class 102 . Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/14/2010. (NVO)
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER finding as moot 158 Motion to Strike; granting 161 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/2/2010.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/12/2009.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss Case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/7/2008.(NVJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
