Austin v. Arizona, State of, et al
Christopher Austin |
Kellie Warren, Arizona, State of, Arizona Juvenile Corrections, Department of and Michael Branham |
2:2008cv01222 |
July 2, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
P.I.: Other Office |
Maricopa |
Lawrence O Anderson |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Dfts' 5 Motion to Dismiss, is GRANTED solely as to (1) Pla's § 1983 claims alleged in Counts Three and Four against the Dft State of Arizona and Dfts Michael Branham and Kellie Warren in their official capa cities as State employees, and (2) Dft Arizona Dept of Juvenile Corrections without leave to amend. FURTHER ORDERED that Dfts' 5 Motion to Dismiss, is GRANTED as to Pla's remaining claims with leave to file an Amended Complaint by 10/6/08 . Failure to file an Amended Complaint by this deadline shall result in the denial of leave to amend ab initio by operation of law and the Clerk is hereby directed to enter Jgm in favor of Dfts and terminate this case. FURTHER ORDERED that Pla' s alleged service of process on Dft Kellie Warren is hereby QUASHED. Absent good cause shown and if an Amended Complaint is timely filed, Pla shall properly serve Dft Kellie Warren with the Amended Complaint on or before 10/31/08 or this lawsuit may be dismissed against her pursuant to Rule 4(m), FED.R.CIV.P.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 9/22/08. (SAT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.