Moreno-Martinez v. United States of America

Petitioner: Leonides Moreno-Martinez
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2008cv01352
Filed: July 22, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office
County: Pinal
Referring Judge: Mark E Aspey (PS)
Presiding Judge: Stephen M McNamee
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 12, 2008 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying with 30 days leave to amend 5 AMENDED MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) Re: Criminal Case No CR 08-187-PHX-SMM. Clerk must enter dismissal without prejudice if Petitioner fails to comply. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 9/11/08. (LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moreno-Martinez v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Leonides Moreno-Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Brent Landis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?