Ekweani et al v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
| C. Henry Ekweani and Ijeamaka Ekweani |
| Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph Arpaio, David Campbell, Kenneth Martinez, Jerry Bruen, Maricopa County, Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County, David R Smith, Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Andrew P. Thomas, Beth Ann Humm, Lisa Kiser, Jane Does and John Does |
| 2:2008cv01551 |
| August 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Maricopa |
| Frederick J Martone |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER granting 77 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs' malicious prosecution claims are dismissed as premature. Summary judgment is granted in favor of defendants on all other claims; denying 79 Plaintiffs' Motion f or Partial Summary Judgment; denying 101 as moot Plaintiffs' Motion to Supplement. The clerk shall enter final judgment. All remaining motions are denied on grounds of mootness. The final pretrial conference and trial date are vacated on grounds of mootness. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 5/24/10.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER GRANTING plas' motion 93 for leave to re-file their response. Dfts shall file a reply no later than March 26, 2010. FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING dfts' motion 90 for leave to file an exhibit in a non-electronic format. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/22/10.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' 42:1985 and 1986 claims (counts IV and V) and defendants Thomas, Humm, Kiser, Smith, MCSO, MCAO, and MBOS are dismissed. All other parties and claims remain. Denying 19 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File surreply. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 4/8/09.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
