Frost v. Schriro et al
| Raymond Ludwig Frost |
| Dora Schriro, Dona Markley, John Hallahan, Charles Goldsmith, David Rivas, John Palosaari, Perkins, Ramos, J. Lyons, Clark, Waite, Burcham, Curtis, Benson, Conger, D Tafoya, Graff, Cooper, King, C Frisbee, Timmons, Hanson, J Brown and Redder |
| 2:2008cv01559 |
| August 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Paul G Rosenblatt |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's in forma pauperis status shall continue for purposes of his pending appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants' Motion for Leave to File Correct Reply (Doc. 127) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Order to Have Defendants Deliver Legal Mail Doc. 125 to Plaintiff (Doc. 129) is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Grant Late Mailings of Notice of Appeal Dated August 26, 2011 and Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Correct Reply Dated Aug 29, 2011 (Doc. 131) is granted to the extent that the Court deems Plaintiff's Objections to Motion for Leave to File Correct Reply (Doc. 132) to have been timely filed, and the remainder of the motion is denied as unnecessary. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 9/20/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the pla's 32 Objections to Magistrate's 31 Order Denying Pla's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint are sustained to the extent that the Magistrate Judge's 31 Order, entered on 8/19/09, is vacated. FURTHER ORDERED that the pla's 33 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Accept Lodged Complaint of April 17, 2009 is granted to the extent that the Clerk of the Court shall file the pla's First Amended Complaint (doc. #17). The date of filing shall be 4/9/09. FURTHER ORDERED that the pla's First Amended Complaint is referred to the Court's Legal Staff for screening. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 10/27/09. (SAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
