Singh v. Vasquez et al
||Chris Vasquez, Katrina S. Kane, Julie L. Meyers, Jonathan Scharfen, Michael Chertoff and Michael B. Mukasey
||October 16, 2008
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee Office
||Mark E Aspey (PS)
||Mary H Murguia
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
|Cause of Action:
||U.S. Government Defendant
|Jury Demanded By:
||28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 30, 2009
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting Dfts' 18 Motion to Dismiss. FURTHER ORDERED declining to adopt the 26 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as Order of this Court. FURTHER ORDERED overruling Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation. FURTHER ORDERED dismissing Petitioner's 1 Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter jgm accordingly. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 9/30/09. (SAT)
|February 5, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that the Motion 18 to Dismiss be granted insofar as it asserts Mr. Singh must pursue his constitutional claim regarding the rescission of the grant of asylum in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appe als. The undersigned recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be denied insofar as it argues the petition must be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies regarding Mr. Singh's constitutional claims, and that the motion be granted insofar as it seeks dismissal of Mr. Singh's claim for relief in the form of his release. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark E Aspey on 2/4/09. (KMG)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?