Palacios v. Kane

Petitioner: Reynaldo Palacios
Respondent: Katrina Kane
Case Number: 2:2008cv02053
Filed: November 5, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee Office
County: Pinal
Referring Judge: Jay R Irwin (PS)
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 17, 2009 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER accepting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Irwin. That Clerk of the Court enter judgment dismissing Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 03/17/09. (ESL, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Palacios v. Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reynaldo Palacios
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Katrina Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?