Roque v. Schriro et al
| Frank Silva Roque |
| Dora Schriro and Terry Goddard |
| 2:2008cv02154 |
| November 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Pima |
| Mark E Aspey (PS) |
| Paul G Rosenblatt |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 65 Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 65 Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 11/29/10.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Aspey's 53 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by the Court; that Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed and denied with prejudice. It is further ordered denying a Ce rtificate of Appealability and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right; denying Petitioner's 57 Motion to Appoint Counsel; that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 10/20/10. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED DENYING Petitioner Roque's 48 Emergency Notice ofObjection to Magistrate Judge Aspey's Ruling and Notice of MOTION (Request) to Replace Magistrate Judge Aspey. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 12/15/09.(SAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
