Ottiano v. Professional Sports Authenticator
Plaintiff: Michael J Ottiano, Sr.
Defendant: Professional Sports Authenticator
Case Number: 2:2009cv00025
Filed: January 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 4 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. ORDER dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint 1 . ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to close this case. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 11/2/09.(TLJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ottiano v. Professional Sports Authenticator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael J Ottiano, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Professional Sports Authenticator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?