Feavel v. Arpaio

Plaintiff: Patrick Feavel
Defendant: Joseph M. Arpaio
Case Number: 2:2009cv00060
Filed: January 8, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prisoner - Prison Condition Office
County: Maricopa
Referring Judge: Mark E Aspey (PS)
Presiding Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 1, 2009 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 as the order of this Court. FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/1/2009. (LAD)
April 14, 2009 8 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint: Recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark E Aspey on 4/13/09. (LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Feavel v. Arpaio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph M. Arpaio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Feavel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?