Proctor v. Schriro et al
| Jerime Antwon Proctor |
| Dora B. Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of |
| 2:2009cv00168 |
| January 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Pinal |
| Lawrence O Anderson (PS) |
| Mary H Murguia |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING in its entirety the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 as the order of the Court. Overruling 13 Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R.Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed 1 . Petitioner's Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 3/29/10. (DMT)
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 7/23/09. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER that the Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the 1 PETITION and this order on respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 2/12/2009. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
