Klein v. Arpaio

Klein v. Arpaio

Plaintiff:	Nicholas Matthew Klein
Defendant:	Joseph Arpaio
Case Number:	2:2009cv00964
Filed:	May 5, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence O Anderson (PS)
Presiding Judge:	David G Campbell
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 7, 2009	Filing 10 ORDER that pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure this action is dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/7/09. (DMT, )
July 6, 2009	Filing 4 ORDER (Service Packet) Plaintiffs Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 3 is granted. Count II of the Complaint (Doc. #1) is dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Joseph Arpaio must answer Count I of the Complaint. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including theComplaint (Doc. #1), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Arpaio. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 20 days of the date of fi ling of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Service Packet due by 7/27/2009. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/6/09. (DMT, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 7, 2009

Filing 10 ORDER that pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure this action is dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/7/09. (DMT, )

July 6, 2009

Filing 4 ORDER (Service Packet) Plaintiffs Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 3 is granted. Count II of the Complaint (Doc. #1) is dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Joseph Arpaio must answer Count I of the Complaint. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including theComplaint (Doc. #1), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Arpaio. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 20 days of the date of fi ling of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Service Packet due by 7/27/2009. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/6/09. (DMT, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Klein v. Arpaio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Matthew Klein
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Arpaio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?