v. Garcia et al
| Israel Garcia, Jessenia M Garcia, Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Quality Loan Service Corporation and John Does, 1-1000 |
| 2:2009cv01146 |
| May 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| G Murray Snow |
| Plaintiff |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss Case of Defendants Aurora Loan Services and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems.That Defendants Aurora Loan Services and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. That the Notice of Lis Pendens filed by Plaintiffs in conjunction with this lawsuit is QUASHED. That Plaintiffs show cause as to why the Court should not dismiss Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failur e to timely serve. Plaintiffs are directed, before 5:00 P.M. on August 20, 2009, to either file proof of service upon Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation or a memorandum demonstrating good cause why Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation has not yet been served. Failure to respond may be considered as consent to the dismissal of Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/31/09.(DMT, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
