Tower v. Ryan et al
| Charles L. Ryan and Berry Larson |
| Cory Lane Tower |
| 2:2009cv01186 |
| June 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Mary H Murguia |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed with prejudice (Doc. 1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in form a pauperis on appeal is DENIED because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 8/22/10. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER the Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the 1 Petition and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 06/26/09. (ESL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
