Aguilar v. Lewis et al

Plaintiff: Alex Aguilar
Defendant: Lewis, Derosa, Mazzola and Matthew Cate
Case Number: 2:2009cv01198
Filed: June 3, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Referring Judge: Jay R Irwin (PS)
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 29, 2009 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the 19 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted. Count Two of the 18 Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Dfts DeRosa and Cate are dismissed without prejudice. An A nswer to Count One of the Second Amended Complaint be required from Dfts Lewis and Mazzola. That service on Dfts Lewis and Mazzola be ordered, and they be required to respond to the Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plainti ff a service packet including both summons and request for waiver forms for said Dfts. Pla shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of the Court within 20 days of the date of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 10/28/09. (ESL)
September 28, 2009 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the 13 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted. It is further ordered that the 12 First Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. It is further ordered granting the 14 Motion to Amend Complaint. The Clerk is directed to file the 15 Second Amended Complaint, subject to further screening by the Court. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 09/28/09. (ESL)
September 10, 2009 13 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 12 First Amended Complaint : Recommending that the First Amended Complaint be dismissed, without prejudice. Further recommended that Pla be given 20 days to file a motion to amend and lodge a proposed second amended complaint, and that if Pla fails to do so, that the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Pla. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jay R Irwin on 09/09/09. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aguilar v. Lewis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alex Aguilar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Derosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mazzola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Cate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?