Hibbard v. Arpaio
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 22, 2009
ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Arpaio's 8 Motion to Dismiss. Arpaio's 8 Motion to Dismiss is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 12/16/09.(ESL, )
|July 21, 2009
ORDER (Service Packet) granting 3 MOTION (APPLICATION) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350 filing fee and is assessed an initial parti al filing fee of $16.07. FURTHER ORDERED Count III is dismissed without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED Defendant Arpaio must answer Counts I and II. FURTHER ORDERED The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint, t his Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Arpaio. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 20 days of the date of filing of this Order. Service Packet deadline 8/10/09. FURTHER ORDERED Defendant must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the FederalRules of Civil Procedure. FURTHER ORDERED This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 USC 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 7/16/09. (MAP)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?