Dowling et al v. Arpaio et al
| Sandra Dowling and Dennis Dowling |
| Joseph Arpaio, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County, Ava Arpaio, John Does I-X, Jane Does I-X, Black Corporations I-V and White Partnerships I-V |
| 2:2009cv01401 |
| July 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
259
ORDER that the Arpaio Defendants' 211 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; that the Maricopa County Defendants' Second 212 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for Defendants accordingly. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 03/14/2012. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
254
ORDER that Plaintiffs' 227 Motion to Strike is denied; that the Board Defendants' 237 Motion to Strike is denied; that oral argument is vacated on Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike and the Board Defendants' Motion to Strike. Howev er, oral argument on the remaining pending Motions (Docs. 211 and 212) is still set for 03/05/12 at 11:00 a.m. It is finally ordered that Plaintiffs and Defendants shall have 15 days from the date of this Order to file any objections/disputes to the 30 additional facts referred to in the Arpaio Defendants' Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment or the Omnibus Statement of Facts if such objection/dispute is not already set forth in the record. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 02/01/12. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
243
ORDER that the Arpaio Defendants' 199 Motion to Strike Portions of D.P. Van Blaricom's Supplemental Expert Report is denied; the parties shall have until 12/16/11 to depose Plaintiffs' expert, D.P. Van Blaricom; vacating oral argum ent on Defendants' 199 Motion to Strike and continuing oral argument on the follow pending motions: the Arpaio Defendants' Second 211 Motion for Summary Judgment, the Maricopa County Defendants' Second 212 Motion for Summary Jud gment, Plaintiffs' 227 Motion to Strike 232 Statements of Fact, and the Maricopa County Defendants' 237 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Omnibus Statement of Facts from 1/17/12 to 03/05/12 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 503, 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 11/17/11. (see attached pdf for complete details) (ESL)
|
|
Filing
196
ORDER that the 195 Motion to extend the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines is denied. This denial is without prejudice to Plaintiffs seeking other sanctions if Defendants failed to comply with the discovery rules or supplement their discovery responses. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 07/01/11. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER that Noyes's 128 Motion for Protective Order Regarding Deposition of Ted Noyes is GRANTED except for the limited purpose of seeking factual information of which Noyes is the only source. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 04/15/11.(ESL)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER that Arpaio Defendants' First Motion for Summary Judgment 56 is granted in part with respect to Counts I and III of the Complaint, and denied in part with respect to Counts IV, V and VI. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 3/8/11.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
