Eason et al v. MTC FINANCIAL INC dba TRUSTEE CORPS. et al
| William J Eason and Erie Lee Eason |
| MTC FINANCIAL INC dba TRUSTEE CORPS., IndyMac Federal Bank, F.S.B. and MERS |
| 2:2009cv01423 |
| July 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| None |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER that Pla's motions for reconsideration (Doc. 66, 68), which the Court interprets as motions for corrections pursuant to Rule 60(a), are GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that, as this Order supercedes the June 4, 2010 Order (Doc. 64), the June 4, 2 010 Judgment (Doc. 65) is VACATED. FURTHER ORDERED that Pla's motion for default judgment (Doc. 63) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Pla's Motion to Correct the Record to Reflect the Proper Name of Dft Entity to its Formal Appellation, re: IndyMac Mortgage Services, a division of One West Bank FSB (Doc. 67) is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Dfts and close the case. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 11/5/10.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 63 Motion for Default Judgment; directing the Clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/4/10.(REW)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER that MERS's 30 motion to dismiss based on Rule 12(b)(6) is granted; MERS's 30 motion to dismiss based on Rule 12(b)(5) is denied; that MTC's 29 motion to dismiss based on Rule 12(b)(6) is granted; MTC's 29 motion for fees and costs is denied without prejudice, with leave to re-file pursuant to LRCiv 54.2; that the Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal, with prejudice, as to MERS and MTC; that Pla has 30 days to re-move for an entry of default under Rule 55(a) against the two remaining dfts, Homeplaceloans.com and IndyMac Bank FSB. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 04/05/10. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying 25 Motion for Summary Disposition; granting 11 Motion to Dismiss based on 9(b) and 12(b)(b) and denying without prejudice MERS' motion to dismiss 11 based on 12(b)(5); granting 14 Motion to Dismiss; MTC motion for fees and costs 14 is denied; denying 18 Motion for Judgment. Pla has 30 days to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified herein. If pla fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court shall, without further Court order, enter judgment of dismissal, with prejudice as to this entire case. FURTHER ORDERED in addition to filing an amended complaint within 30 days, pla must complete service and file the required proofs of service....Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 9/2/2009.(LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
