Koehler v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 17, 2010
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Dfts' 18 Motion to Dismiss, Pla's 16 Motion for Emergency Preliminary Injunction, Pla's 22 Motion for Emergency Action, Pla's 24 Motion to Str ike, and Pla's 30 Motion to Compel Release. Dft's 18 Motion to Dismiss is granted. Pla's 24 Motion to Strike is denied. Pla's 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 22 Motion for Emergency Action, and 30 Motion to Compel Release are all denied as moot. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. The Clerk of Court must enter jgm accordingly. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 9/17/10. (SAT)
|March 23, 2010
ORDER (Service Packet), Counts I, II, III, and IV of the Amended Complaint and Dfts Schriro, Robles, and Courture are dismissed without prejudice. Dfts Schroeder and Ryan must answer Counts V, VI, and VII of the Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court must send Pla a service packet including the Amended Complaint Doc. # 12 , this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Dfts Schroeder and Ryan. Pla must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 20 days of the date of filing of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Service Packet due by 4/12/2010. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 3/22/10. (KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?