Longariello v. Phoenix Union High School District
| Steve J Longariello |
| Phoenix Union High School District |
| 2:2009cv01606 |
| August 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Lawrence O Anderson |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED, nunc pro tunc, that the Court's 9/2/09 8 Order,at 3-4, striking Pla's 1 Complaint, is hereby VACATED. Pla's 1 Complaint, is REINSTATED, effective the date it was originally filed, 8/4/09. FURTHER ORDERED th at Dft Phoenix Union High School District's 13 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Finding that Pla's 10 Amended Complaint fails to state any claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), FED.R.CIV.P., and pro se Pla havin g received a fair opportunity to file an Amended Complaint to cure the original Complaint's factual deficiencies, dismissal is with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter jgm in favor of Dft Phoenix UnionHigh School District and to terminate this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 12/15/09. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and Motion for Judgment by Default, combined with Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss, 18 are summarily DENIED. In an abundance of fairness, the Court hereby authorizes pro se Plaintiff to fi le a Supplemental Response to the merits of Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss, docket # 13 , on or before Monday, November 30, 2009 or Defendant's Motion to Dismiss will be granted and this case terminated in its entirety. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 11/13/09.(DMT, )
|
|
Filing
8
VACATED 12/15/09 PER 25 ORDER - ORDER - IT IS ORDERED Pla's 1 COMPLAINT is hereby STRICKEN for failure to comply with Rule 8, FED.R.CIV.P., and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Pla may file an A mended Complaint that shall fully comply with Rule 8, FED.R.CIV.P., by Friday, 10/2/09. Pla is directed to attach a copy of the EEOC Right to Sue letter as an exhibit to the Amended Complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that if no Amended Complaint is filed by Friday, 10/2/09, the Clerk is hereby directed to dismiss this case without prejudice and further notice. Possible Dismissal deadline set for 10/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 9/1/09. (SAT) Modified on 12/15/2009 (SAT).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Longariello v. Phoenix Union High School District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steve J Longariello | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Phoenix Union High School District | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
