Rodriguez v. Qualify Loan Service Corp. et al
| Martha Rodriguez |
| Qualify Loan Service Corp., Midfirst Bank, Midland Mortgage Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Tres Amigos Properties LLC, XYZ Corporations 1-10, John and Jane Does 1-10 and Black Partnerships 1-10 |
| 2:2009cv01853 |
| September 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Neil V Wake |
| Defendant |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER GRANTING Midfirst Bank and Midland Mortgage's motion for summary judgment on count 1 (doc. 53). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING Wells Fargo's motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. 55) and DENYING Wells Fargo's motion for summary disposition (doc. 59). The clerk is instructed to enter final judgment in favor of all defendants. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 9/1/10(KMG)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED GRANTING pla's 27 Motion to Amend and DENYING dfts' 32 Motion to Strike. FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART dfts' 17 Motion to Dismiss. Counts two, three, and four of the amended complaint are dismissed. We deny dfts' motion to dismiss count one. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 4/13/10. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying 12 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 12/3/09.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
