Pingel v. Arizona, State of et al
James Edward Pingel |
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of and Arizona Attorney General, State of |
2:2009cv02021 |
October 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jay R Irwin (PS) |
G Murray Snow |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER that Magistrate Judge Irwin's 36 Report and Recommendation is accepted in part and denied in part. Count One, Count Two, Count Four, and Count Five are dismissed with prejudice because they have not been exhausted, and Petitioner is proc edurally defaulted from bringing them in state court. Count Three and Count Six are dismissed with prejudice on the merits. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, no COA will be issued. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 03/19/12.(ESL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.