Catto v. Correctional Health Services et al
| 2:2009cv02408 |
| December 31, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition Office |
| Jay R Irwin (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER Pla's Application 3 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency,Pla must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $1.51. The Complaint Doc. # 1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Pla has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Pla fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail to Pla a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner.. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 3/30/10.(KMG) Modified on 3/31/2010 (JEMB TO INDICATE WO).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Catto v. Correctional Health Services et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
