Parker v. Arizona Department of Corrections, State of et al

Case Number: 2:2009cv02437
Filed: November 20, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prisoner - Prison Condition Office
Referring Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 8, 2010 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Pla's 8 Motion for Suspension of Rules is granted; the Court will accept Pla's Amended Complaint although it exceeds the page limit. The duplicative portion of Count II, and Counts III and IV are dismissed without prejudice. Df ts Arredondo, Parks, Wilkinson, and Wilcox are dismissed without prejudice. Dfts Gilbert, Scott, and Guerena must answer Count I of the Amended Complaint and Dfts Larson and McCarville must answer Count II of the Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court must send Pla a service packet including the 9 Amended Complaint, this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Dfts Gilbert, Scott, Guerena, Larson, and McCarville. Pla must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 20 days of the date of filing of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 04/08/10. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker v. Arizona Department of Corrections, State of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?