derry v. American Brokers Conduit et al

Case Number: 2:2009cv02549
Filed: December 7, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Truth in Lending Office
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1446 Petition for Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 2, 2010 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Dfts Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Bank of America's Motion to Strike 18 Pla's "Memorandum of Law and Response for Details" is granted. The Clerk shall leave the Memorandum imaged in the electronic records of the c ourt. FURTHER ORDERED that Dfts Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss 10 joined 11 by Dft American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Pla Yvonne Derry may file a motion to amend the Complaint and separately lodge a proposed Amended Complaint by February 19, 2010. The Clerk is directed to terminate this case without further order if Pla does not file a motion to amend and lodge a proposed Amended Complaint by February 19, 2010. FURTHER ORDERED that Dft American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.'s request for award of attorneys' fees incurred in preparing its joinder in the motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 2/2/10.(KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: derry v. American Brokers Conduit et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?