Jones v. Walker et al
| 2:2009cv02679 |
| December 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| G Murray Snow |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 , Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED with prejudice. Mr. Jones' Motion for Summary Judgment 9 is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED because Mr. Jones has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE this action. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/16/10. (DMT)
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment : Recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and dismissed with prejudice; Recommending that the Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 5/20/10. (TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Walker et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
