Walker v. Internal Revenue Service

Petitioner: William J Walker
Respondent: Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 2:2009mc00080
Filed: July 16, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 26:7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Jury Demanded By: 26:7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 11, 2009 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE, Petitioner William Walker's 1 Motion for court to quash summons and motion for order that debt has been paid in full with legal tender are denied; the Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/10/09. (REW, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William J Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?