Stejic v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Stejic v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al

Stejic v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al

Case Number:	2:2010cv00051
Filed:	January 8, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge:	David G Campbell
Nature of Suit:	Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 20, 2010	Filing 68 ORDER that Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. 48 , 51 , 54 ) are granted. The consumer fraud claim asserted in count five of the complaint is dismissed, and the corresponding request for injunctive relief in count six is denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/20/10.(ESL)
July 22, 2010	Filing 46 ORDER granting/denying in parte Motion to Remand Certain Claims (Doc. #457, in MDL-2119). ORDERED that with respect to Stejic (CV 10-51-PHX-JAT), claim 1 (wrongful foreclosure), claim 2 (breach of contract), claim 3 (breach of the covenant of good fa ith and fair dealing), claim 4 (fraud), and part of claim 6 (injunctive relief) remain with the undersigned as part of the MDL; claim 5 (consumer fraud act), and part of claim 6 (injunctive relief) are remanded to Judge Campbell; to accomplish the bi furcation of this case within this district, the Clerk of the Court is directed to bifurcate Stejic into two cases; the Clerk of the Court shall draw and assign a new Phoenix case number to the portion of the Stejic case that is remaining with the un dersigned and the Clerk of the Court shall consolidate that case number into the MDL as a member case. The Clerk of the Court shall transfer the original Stejic case number back to Judge Campbell...See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/22/10. (Original Order filed in MDL-2119 (Doc. 964)) (MAP)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 20, 2010

Filing 68 ORDER that Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. 48 , 51 , 54 ) are granted. The consumer fraud claim asserted in count five of the complaint is dismissed, and the corresponding request for injunctive relief in count six is denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/20/10.(ESL)

July 22, 2010

Filing 46 ORDER granting/denying in parte Motion to Remand Certain Claims (Doc. #457, in MDL-2119). ORDERED that with respect to Stejic (CV 10-51-PHX-JAT), claim 1 (wrongful foreclosure), claim 2 (breach of contract), claim 3 (breach of the covenant of good fa ith and fair dealing), claim 4 (fraud), and part of claim 6 (injunctive relief) remain with the undersigned as part of the MDL; claim 5 (consumer fraud act), and part of claim 6 (injunctive relief) are remanded to Judge Campbell; to accomplish the bi furcation of this case within this district, the Clerk of the Court is directed to bifurcate Stejic into two cases; the Clerk of the Court shall draw and assign a new Phoenix case number to the portion of the Stejic case that is remaining with the un dersigned and the Clerk of the Court shall consolidate that case number into the MDL as a member case. The Clerk of the Court shall transfer the original Stejic case number back to Judge Campbell...See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/22/10. (Original Order filed in MDL-2119 (Doc. 964)) (MAP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stejic v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?