Rhoads v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. et al
||January 28, 2010
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||Neil V Wake
|Nature of Suit:
||Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 5, 2011
ORDER: 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief Pursuant to FRCP 60(b)(6) is denied. See order for details. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 8/5/11. (NKS)
|April 7, 2010
ORDER that the 7 Motion to Dismiss by Dfts JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and California Reconveyance Company is granted; that Pla's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to Dft California Reconveyance Company for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and attys' fees and costs under A.R.S. § 33-807(E) are awarded in favor of Dft California Reconveyance Company and against Pla Douglas C. Rhoads; that Counts 1-7, 9, 10-12, 15, 16 and 18 of the Complaint against Dft JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and Counts 8, 13, 14 and 17 are dismissed for failure to plead fraud with particularity and failure to state a claim upon whic h relief can be granted with leave to file an amended complaint by 04/20/10; that Pla show cause by 04/20/10, regarding why the Complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice as to all of the Dfts named in the Complaint who have not been served with process. Pla's 8 Request for Leave to Amend Complaint is denied without prejudice to seeking leave to amend in compliance with Local Rules by 04/13/10. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 04/06/10. (ESL)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?