AOM Group, LLC et al v. DHI Mortgage Company, Ltd. et al
AOM Group, LLC, Triple Play Land Trust, Serjio Hernandez and Yvette Hernandez |
NGM Properties, LLC, OneWest Bank, FSB, DHI Mortgage Company, Ltd., DHI Title of Arizona, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, William Zinman, PC and Unknown Parties |
2:2010cv00208 |
January 29, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
G Murray Snow |
All Other Real Property |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER that AOM Group's Complaint is dismissed for failure to prosecute. That NGM's 12 Motion for Sanctions, is denied. NGM may seek attorneys' fees and costs as the prevailing party in a contract actionby following the local procedur e regarding fee applications.That all other remaining pending motions be denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED releasing, voiding, rescinding, striking andexpunging the Lis Pendens recorded on or about December 9, 2009, Maricopa CountyRecorder No. 2009-112 6737, by Attorney Richard Clark and Orlando Sagarnaga for AOMGroup LLC, relating to the property at: 4535 N. 111TH GLEN, PHOENIX, AZ 85037,legally described as: Lot 221, CAMELBACK RANCH UNIT 2, according to Book 777 ofMaps, Page 27, Records of Maricopa County, Arizona.Directing the Clerk of the Court to terminate thisaction. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/20/10.(DMT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.