Mesi et al v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al
| Fred Mesi and Eric Mesi |
| Danita F Fallen, Meshelle Baggerman, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, LaSalle Bank NA, Western Exchange Services Corp, Washington Mutual Bank FA, California Reconveyance Company, Western Title Company, Inc., Geneva Martrakus and Bank of America, N.A. |
| 2:2010cv00218 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James A Teilborg |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER that Defendant LaSalle Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (CV 10- 218, Doc. 49) is granted. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Washington Mutual, FA is dismissed. The Clerk shall enter judgment for Defendants. The Clerk shall file a copy of this Order in MDL 09-2119-PHX-JAT and CV 10-218-PHX-JAT. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/25/12.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER that with respect to Mesi (CV 10-218-PHX-JAT) claims 4-12 and part of claims 1, 2 and 13 remain with the undersigned as part of the MDL and claim 3 and part of claims 1, 2 and 13 have been remanded to the transferor court. MERS shall file a copy of this Order with the transferor court within the next two business days. SEE ORDER FOR FULL/COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 4/23/10. (Original Order filed in Lead MDL-2119, doc #409). (MAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
