Guillen v. Owens et al
| Karl Louis Guillen |
| Dora B. Schriro, Unknown Cioni, Richard Fisher, Terry Stewart, Quincy Owens, Charles Ryan, B Roberts, Deleena Carrillo, Unknown Wilson, D Hatfield, Paula Berger, Stacey Crabtree, W White, D Tuersbuns, Michele Obrien, Cristina Renault, Berry Larson, Unknown Mendoza, J Baca, Unknown Sturm, Shannon Aragon, John Yielding, Unknown Putnam, Unknown Smith and Unknown Hauser |
| 2:2010cv00226 |
| January 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
243
ORDER denying 237 Plaintiff's Motion for Change of Judge for Cause with Affidavit. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/15/12.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
211
ORDER denying 175 Motion to Reassign Case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/2/2012.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER denying 173 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time. Dispositive motion deadline is extended to 12/16/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 12/2/11.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER denying 133 Motion for Sanctions; denying 150 Motion to Strike. (See document for full details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 11/23/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Request for Deposition of Defendants Owens, Crabrtree, Berger, Renault and Carrillo, doc. 70, is GRANTED. The Motion for Leave to Conduct Deposition of Defendant Ryan, doc. 67, is DENIED. (See document for full details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 6/27/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER (Service Packet), Counts I (in part), II (in part), III (in part), IV, V (in part), VI, and VII and Defendants Stewart, Schriro, Tuerbuns, Sturm, Cioni, Smith, and Hauser are dismissed without prejudice; Defendants Ryan, Crabtree, Baca, Larson, Owens, Wilson, Fisher, Yielding, Berger, O'Brien, Putnam, Roberts, Mendoza, Aragon, Hatfield, Renault, White, and Carrillo must answer Counts I (in part), II (in part), III (in part), and V (in part) 17 ; the Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the First Amended Complaint 17 , this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Ryan, Crabtree, Baca, Larson, Owens, Wilson, Fisher, Yielding, Berger, O'Brien, Putnam, Roberts, Mendoza, Arag on, Hatfield, Renault, White, and Carrillo; Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk within 20 days; denying Plaintiff's 18 MOTION for Injunctive Relief; this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 11/29/10. (REW)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with the 7/2/10 order 14 to the extent set forth below. Plaintiff is granted an additional 30 days from the filing date of this Order in which to file a first amended complaint in complianc e with the July 2, 2010 Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the filing date of this Order, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment ofdismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 8/24/10.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying 7 Plaintiff's Motion to Expedite. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 4/5/10.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
