Dumesnil, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
Karen Dumesnil and Brian K Dumesnil |
Recontrust Company, N.A., Countrywide Home Loans, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, Bank of America, N.A. and Unknown Parties |
2:2010cv00243 |
February 2, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Neil V Wake |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER that Dfts' 8 Motion to Dismiss by Dfts Bank of America, N.A., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, and Recontrust Company, N.A., is granted. Counts 1-7, 10-12, 15, 16, 17, and 18 of the Complaint are d ismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; Count 9 of the Complaint as against Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, and Recontrust Company, N.A. is dismissed with prejudice, and Count 9 as against Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., is dismissed with leave to amend; Counts 8, 13 and 14 are dismissed for failure to plead fraud with particularity and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted with leave to file an amended complaint; that the Clerk enter judgment dismissing this action with prejudice after 04/20/10, if Plas do not file an amended complaint by 04/20/10. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 04/06/10. (ESL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.