Bachrach et al v. Covenant Transportation, Inc. et al
| Carrie Bachrach and Randolph Bachrach |
| Covenant Transportation, Inc., Alfred Ricardo Simister and Donovan B McFarlane |
| 2:2010cv00315 |
| February 12, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
149
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion for New Trial or, in the Alternative, Motion for Remittur. The request for remittitur is granted in the amounts stated in this PDF document. Plaintiffs have until July 13, 2012 to file a notice with the court accepting the remittitur. If one or both plaintiffs decline to accept the remittitur, then I will grant a new trial to the plaintiff or plaintiffs declining to accept. Signed by Senior Judge Garr M King on 6/18/12.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
49
OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion 43 for Partial Summary Judgment is granted with respect to plaintiffs' claims for punitive damages and denied as to plaintiffs' Second and Fifth Causes of Action. Plaintiffs' claims against defendant McFarlane and plaintiffs' Sixth Cause of Action against defendant Covenant are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert E Jones on 3/31/11.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
