Bohannan v. Arizona, State of et al
| Rickie Ray Bohannan |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles Ryan |
| 2:2010cv00336 |
| February 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 . The request for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk shall close this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find theruling debatable. Signed by Chief Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/9/11. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254): IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Petitioners Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 5) be DENIED andDISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be DENIED because the dismissal of the Amended Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. (See document for full details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 1/31/11. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
