Eline v. Wake

Plaintiff: Richard Charles Eline
Defendant: Neil V Wake
Case Number: 2:2010cv00338
Filed: February 17, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 18, 2010 4 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, the 1 Complaint and this action are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); if Plaintiff wishes to reassert these claims in the future, he must prepay the entire $350.00 filing fee when he files his action; the Clerk must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 3/15/10. (REW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eline v. Wake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Charles Eline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neil V Wake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?