Gillespie et al v. Countrywide Bank FSB et al
Plaintiff:
Katherine A. Gillespie and Steven R. Gillespie
Defendant:
MERSCORP, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, Bank of America, N.A., Recontrust Company, N.A., Lisa Klimenko, Countrywide Financial Corporation, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Countrywide Bank, FSB
Case Number:
2:2010cv00413
Filed:
February 25, 2010
Court:
Arizona District Court
Office:
Phoenix Division Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit:
Foreclosure
Cause of Action:
28:1444
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| June 4, 2010 | 40 |
AMENDED ORDER (re 39 ORDER) That the Motion to Remand Certain Claims (Doc. #364, MDL-2119) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. FURTHER ORDERED that with respect to Gillespie (CV 10-413-PHX-JAT) the motion is denied without prejudice. Moving Defe ndants shall have ten days after the Court rules on the motions for leave to amend to file a motion to remand all claims that it asserts the panel remanded to the respective transferor courts in the transfer orders. SEE ORDER FOR FULL/COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/4/10. (Original Order filed in Lead MDL-2119, doc #631). (MAP)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
