Baca v. Callahan et al
| Carey M Baca |
| La Paz, County of, State Title Agency, Inc, Steven R Callahan, James P Shubin, Debe Hayes, Cindie Douglas, Patricia L Wall, Lisa M Callahan, Shelly Baker, SRC Sundance, LLC, Unknown Parties and Arizona, State of |
| 2:2010cv00885 |
| April 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| G Murray Snow |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER that County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 50 is granted; the State of Arizona's Motion to Dismiss 72 is granted; Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 13 is dismissed with prejudice as to the claims against the following Def endants: Rosnagle, Shubin, Copper Canyon Enterprises, Schluter, Diamond Bay Investments, Steven Callahan, Lisa Callahan, and SRC Sundance. The only remaining claim is a negligence claim against Defendant Hayes. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Am end Complaint 81 is denied. ORDER that all other pending motions in this action 54 ; 56 ; 61 ; 63 ; and 82 are denied as moot. ORDER that Plaintiff must show good cause as to why Defendant Debe Hayes should not be dismissed on or before 9/8/11. ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to dismiss Defendant Debe Hayes and terminate this action if Plaintiff fails to comply (see attached pdf for complete information). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/25/11.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER denying 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Electronic Filing. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/20/10.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER dismissing the First Amended Complaint, Doc. 7 , with leave to file a Second Amended Complaint by August 11, 2010. FURTHER ORDERED that if Pla elects not to file a Second Amended Complaint by August 11, 2010, the Clerk of the Court is directed to dismiss this action without further Order of the Court. FURTHER ORDERED that if Pla elects to file a Second Amended Complaint, the Complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens the Second Amended Complaint pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/12/10. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 8, with leave to file an Amended Complaint by 6/4/10; if Plaintiff elects not to file an Amende d Complaint by 6/4/10, the Clerk shall dismiss this action without further Order of the Court; if Plaintiff elects to file an Amended Complaint, the Complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens the Amended Complaint pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 5/5/10.(REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
